The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau has substantially
overhauled the compliance and disclosure requirements imposed on mortgage
lenders, and established a new and more comprehensive set of requirements
designed to better protect the consumer as they go through the mortgage
process. These new regulations went into
effect in October, 2015.
There are two important components to the new
regulations, known colloquially as “TRID” (TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure). The new rules integrate the former separate
disclosure requirements into one complete process. These rules do not apply to all loan
transactions, but generally they will apply to a conventional residential purchase
money or refinance loan.
Under TRID, you will find that you will no longer receive
a sheath of paper from the lender to wade through once you submit your loan
application. Instead, just two
disclosure forms are involved. The first
is the Loan Estimate, which integrates the former Good Faith Estimate and the
early Truth in Lending forms given to the borrower following application. The new Loan Estimate combines the
information on all prior forms into one more detailed and complete document,
including an accurate disclosure of all closing costs. The Loan Estimate must be provided to the
applicant no later than three business days after a loan application is
submitted.
The second document is the Closing Disclosure (CD). This
document integrates the former final Truth In Lending statement and the
RESPA-required HUD-1 settlement statement.
The CD, in one comprehensive document, not only itemizes the final closing
costs formerly shown on the HUD-1 form, but also states all of the other loan
terms, rights and obligations in easy-to-understand language. The CD must also
be provided to the applicant three business days before the loan closing. If the final figures on the CD diverge from
those on the Loan Estimate, the lender must explain why, and in some cases the
divergence will require the lender to prepare and provide a new CD, also
subject to an additional three day rule.
This gives the lender and other parties in the transaction incentive to
get it right the first time. And
thankfully, gone are the days when an overworked and understaffed lender is
scrambling to provide closing figures to a borrower just hours before a closing
is to take place. The new rule means
the lender must be more organized ahead of time in order to meet the three-day
rule requirement.
These are big changes, and there is a substantial
learning curve still in process. In my
view, however, these rules will result in far better consumer protection, truth
and transparency in the mortgage industry.
And a (somewhat self-serving) P.S.: TRID clearly states that the borrower may
choose the attorney who will close the loan transaction; the lender may no
longer refuse to work with the attorney of borrower’s choosing. This means that if you are working with an
attorney you like and trust, you may require that your attorney also close your
loan. I have written previously about
the benefit to a buyer of using the same attorney for both the purchase and
sale phase and the loan closing phase of the transaction. TRID now ensures that
the consumer is entitled to that benefit, so you will be sure the entire
transaction is handled by the attentive and competent lawyer you have selected. Like me.
No comments:
Post a Comment